09/02/2025

Comparison Of Energy Storage Technologies

Energy Storage Technical Parameters

Here, the comparison of energy storage technologies based on performance parameters are given here. The comparison of energy storage is given by considering following technical parameters.

  • Round trip energy efficiency
  • Discharge hours
  • C rate
  • Operating cost
  • Cycle life
  • Maturity of technology

Energy Storage Techniques by Parameter

 

Energy storage systems

Lead acid

Li-Ion

Nas*

Flow batteries

Flywheel

CAES*

PHS*

Round Trip Energy Efficiency (DC-DC)

70-85%

85-95%

70-80%

 

60-75%

60-80%

50-65%

70-80%

 

Discharge hours

2-6 hours

0.25-4 hours

6-8 hours

4-12 hours

0.25-4 hours

4-10 hours

6-20 hours

C Rate

C/6 to C/2

C/6 to 4C

C/8 to C/6

C/12 to C/4

C/4 to 4C

NA

NA

Cost range per energy available in each full discharge ($/ kWh)

100-300

250-800

400-600

400-1000

1000-4000

>15010

50-15016

Development & Construction Period

6 month – 1 years

6 month – 1 years

6 month – 1.5 years

6 month – 1.5 years

1-2 years

3-10 years

5-15 years

Operating Cost

High

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

High

Low

Estimated Space Required

large

Small

Moderate

Moderate

Small

Moderate

Large

Cycle life: # of discharges of stored energy

500-2000

2000-10,000+

3000-5000

5000-8000+

10,000

10,000+

10,000+

Maturity of Technology

Mature

Commercial

Commercial

Early to moderate

Early to moderate

Moderate

Mature

 

CAES – Compressed air energy storage

PHS – Pumped hydro storage

NAS – Sodium Sulphur batteries

Meaning of C Rate

The C rate is important parameter in the different energy storage system particularly in the electrochemical batteries. The C rate is an inverse measure of the rate over which a system can provide maximum rated power. The range of discharge duration is directly linked to the C rate. It is expressed in terms of 1C, 2C, C/2. C rate of 2C means that all it supplies all its stored energy in ½ hours whereas C/2 means it supply all its stored energy in 2 hours. Therefore, we can say that higher C rate can discharge at a higher maximum power than compare with lower C rate.  Higher C rate has higher power to energy ratio. High power application requires high C rate and short discharge duration.

Sodium based batteries, flow batteries, CAED and PHS are suitable for high energy and long duration applications. C rate is not used for CAES and PHS as the duration of energy storage is not limited by technology as in case of electrochemical batteries.

Cost

Levelized cost method is used to compare costs across different energy sources or technologies.

Space requirement and maturity of technology

Lithium-ion batteries find applications where space and weight is critical consideration. In terms of maturity, lead acid batteries have been around for over 100 years and very mature in terms of technology performance and manufacturing. The Lithium-ion batteries reached commercial maturity with multiple companies setting up GWh scale manufacturing plants.

Capital cost

Figure shows that the capital cost per cycle of some storage system decreases.

Energy storage, energy storage technique, compare energy storage techniques, energy storage techniques pdf, energy storage technique compare pdf, c rate, meaning of c rate in battery, c rate in battery


No comments:

Post a Comment